- Font Size:
- Default font size
- Larger font size
BY JOE CARLSON
jcarlson@nwitimes.com
219.662.5339 | Tuesday, June 26, 2007 | (2 comment(s))
HAMMOND | The war in Iraq and Internet blogs were two of the topics that lawyers and a judge used Monday to question 15 jurors selected in the federal case against Vikram Buddhi.
Buddhi is charged with 11 crimes for posting messages on Internet discussion forums that exhorted Iraqis and others to kill President George Bush, Vice President Dick Cheney, and their wives and to blow up American infrastructure.
Opening statements in the five-day trial are scheduled to begin this morning in U.S. District Court in Hammond.
Buddhi is an Indian national who was legally in the United States while attending engineering classes at Purdue University in West Lafayette for more than 10 years.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Philip Benson said Buddhi's comments show he harbors a deep hatred for America's leaders and is a danger to society. As evidence of guilt, Benson intends to show that Buddhi attempted to hide his identity by using other students' computer addresses.
Buddhi says the online comments came during Internet debates, which are known for turning more vitriolic than ordinary debates. He maintains the comments were intended as a protest of the war, and not "true threats" that he believed anyone would carry out.
On Monday, U.S. District Judge James Moody asked jurors whether they could remain impartial toward someone whose views of the Iraq war were different from theirs. One man was dismissed when he said he could not.
Jurors were asked about their military service. At one point, eight of the 15 jurors said either they or their family members had served in the armed forces. A few of them later were dismissed.
None of the jurors said they harbored prejudice toward someone born in another country.
Buddhi's attorney, John Martin, has raised the issue in pretrial motions because some of the "crude" online comments are directed toward "Anglo-Saxons," many of whom were likely to comprise the jury pool.
Asked about Internet use, only one of the initial 15 jurors said he had ever read an Internet blog. Moody even said he did not know what a blog was.
Back to story 2 comment(s)
- It wasn't clear, concise or focused on the topic in the story.
- It was a personal attack, vulgar, explicit or degrading, used actual or implied profanity or contained potentially libelous statements.
- It accused someone of being guilty of a crime.
- It promoted violence or illegal acts.
- It contained telephone numbers or street addresses, or e-mail addresses and links to Web sites other than nwi.com or government agencies.
In no way do these comments represent the views of The Times or Lee Enterprises.
Passionate views, pointed criticism and critical thinking are welcome. Name-calling, crude and profane language and personal abuse are not welcome.
Reader comments will not be edited - they will be approved or declined. They may be used in the print edition of the newspaper.
If you feel a posted comment has violated these guidelines, please email our New Media team the commenter's name, the comment and a link to the article.
For more information please read our Terms of Service.
Patsy wrote on Jun 26, 2007 3:05 PM:
G Davis wrote on Jun 26, 2007 2:32 PM: