COLUMBUS, Ind. | David Spicer gutted his one-story home after a nearby creek flooded last weekend.

He and some friends ripped out soggy insulation and removed the ruined furnace. He even carved away a couple feet of flood-damaged drywall to fight mold.

Now, he must figure out how he'll pay to replace everything. Spicer, like most of his neighbors, has no flood insurance.

"We're kind of hoping that the government and FEMA will do something," he said. "It's pretty devastating."

Recent flooding that swamped parts of the Midwest, including Indiana, Wisconsin and Iowa, caught many property owners unprotected. Only 1 percent of all Indiana homeowners have flood insurance. Wisconsin reports even less than that. People generally pass on federally backed flood coverage because they don't realize it falls outside standard home insurance or they underestimate the risk.

"I think there is a perception among people that if they don't live right near a body of water that their home can't flood," said Julie Rochman, CEO of the Institute for Business and Home Safety, an insurance industry funded research organization. "You can find flooding anywhere in the United States. Mountaintops flood."

Spicer passed on coverage because he doesn't live in a flood plain, and the bank didn't require it. But the creek near his house rose quickly last weekend, filling his basement and taking out his family room and entertainment center. Then it saturated the first floor with mud, prompting the mass clean-out.

"We just have a shell here now," he said.

Warm fronts from the South have clashed with slow-moving systems from the West to dump unusually heavy storms and flooding on places like Indiana and Iowa this spring, said John Kwiatowski, a National Weather Service meteorologist.

A lack of flood insurance isn't limited to the Midwest. The National Flood Insurance Program estimates that only half the property owners were insured when hurricanes Katrina and Rita tore up the Gulf Coast in 2005. The program paid $15 billion to those who did have coverage during what it deems the costliest storm season on record.

The federal government provides nearly all flood coverage for homes and businesses through its National Flood Insurance Program. Insurance companies market the coverage. Their agents receive a small commission and then pass the premium money on to the government.

Rochman said many homeowners fail to read their policies closely to learn that flood coverage is typically excluded. Insurers specialize in covering accidental loss, or events like lightning strikes that happen rarely. Flooding is too risky for them.

A house has a 26 percent chance of being damaged by a flood during a 30-year mortgage. In contrast, the risk of fire damage is only 9 percent, according to the National Flood Insurance Program.